Reports Economy Feedback Sports Car Cocktail Culture Journal VAT Money Housing Health preceda self

Pravda.sk Home News European elections 2014 World Regions Economy Culture Sports preceda self serve Weather Opinions history on Most news reports Magazines Car Commercial Housing Travel Money Job Cocktail VAT Animals Female Health Journal spoon Cakes Recipes preceda self serve Ideas Advice Cars Real Estate Jobs Phone Computer Camera Demands More Awesome preceda self serve ads Birdz Blog Flog Discounts cellar ePravda Relax Hand We read to children Debate Theatres Festivals Games Horoscopes Pictures Infographics Cinemas Concerts Skull Flowers Sudoku Contests TV program
Reports Economy Feedback Sports Car Cocktail Culture Journal VAT Money Housing Health preceda self serve Professions Traveling Woman Blog Latest Articles Most Read Articles Articles List The most blogs Commercial Blogs
Surely I'm not the only one who in recent weeks has registered Article V. Putin in an American newspaper New York Times ways of addressing war in Syria, where they planted for compliance with international law and rejected the idea that the U.S. is so "exceptional" that the intervention in foreign states do not require the consent of the UN Security Council. The actual article was written objectively and brought rational arguments in favor of the Russian position in solving the problems in Syria: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/12/opinion/putin-plea-for-caution-from-russia-on-syria.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
What struck me but the whole thing was surprised, was not so averse expected U.S. response, but rather a reaction preceda self serve to one of the top U.S. politicians, Senator J. McCain, who published his "protičlánok" the Russian newspaper Pravda: http://www.pravda.ru / news/world/northamerica/usacanada/19-09-2013/1174849-McCain_for_pravda_ru-0 /
Anyone who has read the two articles, he sees between them at first sight a huge difference. President V. Putin wrote hard, but diplomatically and rationally talked about Syria, not E. Snowden, B. Manning, Guantanamo preceda self serve and other human and legal problems in the United States. Conversely, Senator J. McCain instead of rational arguments on Syria began to deal with the situation in Russia and used the argument ad hominem against President Putin. On some objections Senator J. McCain against preceda self serve the Russian government preceda self serve could be even discussed, but given that the reservations were made during the Russia - U.S. debate on the situation preceda self serve in Syria, do not operate reliably. Rather, it seems that this is a purposeful criticism of the Russian government power because of its unwillingness to agree to U.S. military intervention in Syria.
Unfortunately, Senator J. McCain's article, which was published in a letter to the Russian people, not only acts as a dedicated and dishonest, but it is also written coarse and populist language. It seems very hypocritical when Senator J. McCain declares in the introduction preceda self serve letter for a friend of the Russian people and says that he believes in his self-determination. preceda self serve J. McCain and other American politicians, however, not very sensitive to the opinion of the majority of Russians. Policy President Putin in the U.S. constantly criticize, although preceda self serve Putin has the broad support of the masses, while B. Yeltsin's policy, preceda self serve which was unpopular among the Russian people, preceda self serve the U.S. actively supported. It seems that American preceda self serve policy on what the Russian people want, does not matter much. Sounds preceda self serve completely absurd in this context, the argument of Senator preceda self serve J. McCain, he is more pro-Russian than the current Russian regime! The McCain's rhetoric closely resembles the rhetoric of Soviet Communist leaders of the past who also claimed that they like working for the American people and have it much better than the "bourgeois ruling clique in the United preceda self serve States."
Another dubious rhetoric in the letter preceda self serve J. McCain, the calculation of the shortcomings of the Russian state. preceda self serve As I say, some of these shortcomings contemporary Russia could be discussed, but given that the entire letter was written in the situation of measuring forces because Syria and operates unreliable. The problem is the fact that most of the objections raised by Senator J. McCain to contemporary Russia, might just as well float against preceda self serve the current of the United States. But in the case of U.S. Senator J. McCain the problems preceda self serve of dissidents and human rights somehow ignored. When speaking of the value of dignity, freedom and self-determination could also ask the prisoners in Guantanamo or in secret CIA prisons. He could ask the undignified methods "waterboarding", or to which country is the most prisoners in the world. They are clearly the U.S. and even Communist China, which is four times more populous than the U.S., has fewer inmates.
Senator J. McCain as U.S. Representative recalled the important preceda self serve value of "rule of law" (rule of law). Value to determine preceda self serve which is certainly important, preceda self serve only that it was just his country, who wanted to "rule of law" in international law at the Syrian removed. preceda self serve Senator J. McCain mentioned that the rule of law which should be clear, consistent, impartial and fair. At least the fairness and impartiality "rule of law" in the United States may be entitled to doubt when the U.S. on the one hand vigorously persecute E. Snowden, but those who massively violated the U.S. Constitution according to Sno